<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a new search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:25:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: timo</title>
		<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8527</link>
		<dc:creator>timo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/#comment-8527</guid>
		<description>BING : But It&#039;s Not Google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BING : But It&#8217;s Not Google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harm</title>
		<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8524</link>
		<dc:creator>harm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/#comment-8524</guid>
		<description>Do they really think that they can make a difference with this. We already have Google and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scoopler.com&quot; title=&quot;scoopler&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;scoopler&#039;s real-time search&lt;/a&gt; - what else do we need? Not that crappy background pictures anyhow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they really think that they can make a difference with this. We already have Google and <a href="http://www.scoopler.com" title="scoopler" rel="nofollow">scoopler&#8217;s real-time search</a> &#8211; what else do we need? Not that crappy background pictures anyhow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Floris</title>
		<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8516</link>
		<dc:creator>Floris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 09:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/#comment-8516</guid>
		<description>O wow really interesting new work stuff... no really interesting... no really</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O wow really interesting new work stuff&#8230; no really interesting&#8230; no really</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rulio Iglesias</title>
		<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8515</link>
		<dc:creator>Rulio Iglesias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/#comment-8515</guid>
		<description>Is this the logo of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0007147/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Friends spin-off series&lt;/a&gt;? &quot;Could search results &lt;em&gt;be&lt;/em&gt; any better?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the logo of a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0007147/" rel="nofollow">Friends spin-off series</a>? &#8220;Could search results <em>be</em> any better?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Mayata</title>
		<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8500</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Mayata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/#comment-8500</guid>
		<description>i remember hating the google logo too. Didnt seem to matter as far as succes goes. But what was great about google is that it was so fast. The simple page (white, txt and logo) helped doing that. I dont know if these big photos are a good idea for a search page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i remember hating the google logo too. Didnt seem to matter as far as succes goes. But what was great about google is that it was so fast. The simple page (white, txt and logo) helped doing that. I dont know if these big photos are a good idea for a search page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timo</title>
		<link>http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/comment-page-1/#comment-8496</link>
		<dc:creator>timo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ilovenewwork.com/2009/05/28/a-new-search/#comment-8496</guid>
		<description>I guess the guys at Microsoft will never learn to design... But its part of their identity now, so hey...

Also, I really get seconds thoughts when looking at the video. I&#039;m afraid it&#039;s too big, too complex, too many options, trying to be all sites at once and not a search engine... (thats my little &#039;linux and free-software&#039; voice talking, where every software does somethig very small, but very good)

And to continue this little rant... &#039;Bing&#039; shows a strategy where Microsoft apparently knows exactly how we use search engines... It&#039;s a very &#039;top-down decided&#039; approach... This in contrast to Google, Facebook, Flickr etc.. that started as simple tools, and then developed according to the needs of the users...  

End of bash. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the guys at Microsoft will never learn to design&#8230; But its part of their identity now, so hey&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, I really get seconds thoughts when looking at the video. I&#8217;m afraid it&#8217;s too big, too complex, too many options, trying to be all sites at once and not a search engine&#8230; (thats my little &#8216;linux and free-software&#8217; voice talking, where every software does somethig very small, but very good)</p>
<p>And to continue this little rant&#8230; &#8216;Bing&#8217; shows a strategy where Microsoft apparently knows exactly how we use search engines&#8230; It&#8217;s a very &#8216;top-down decided&#8217; approach&#8230; This in contrast to Google, Facebook, Flickr etc.. that started as simple tools, and then developed according to the needs of the users&#8230;  </p>
<p>End of bash. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

